Hem / Filmer / Feedback|tips / Uppdaterat (Sajt mer aktiv januari 2008-september 2011. Har haft ca 320 000 sidvisningar.)
Diverse i media:
klimat, klimatforskare, climate, koldioxid, solaktivitet. (Skapa nyhetsbox här.)

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Vindkrafts juridiska immunitet vid masslakt av fåglar

Exempel på följd av den ej faktastyrda (och i den meningen religiösa) överideologi och ordning som miljöalarmismen kommit att bli, med (heliga) symboler som just vindkraft.

Inledande del av en artikel nyligen i Wall Street Journal, av Robert Bryce:

ExxonMobil pleaded guilty in federal court to killing 85 birds that had come into contact with crude oil or other pollutants in uncovered tanks or waste-water facilities on its properties. The birds were protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which dates back to 1918. The company agreed to pay $600,000 in fines and fees.

ExxonMobil is hardly alone in running afoul of this law. Over the past two decades, federal officials have brought hundreds of similar cases against energy companies. In July, for example, the Oregon-based electric utility PacifiCorp paid $1.4 million in fines and restitution for killing 232 eagles in Wyoming over the past two years. The birds were electrocuted by poorly-designed power lines.

Yet there is one group of energy producers that are not being prosecuted for killing birds: wind-power companies. And wind-powered turbines are killing a vast number of birds every year.

A July 2008 study of the wind farm at Altamont Pass, Calif., estimated that its turbines kill an average of 80 golden eagles per year. The study, funded by the Alameda County Community Development Agency, also estimated that about 10,000 birds—nearly all protected by the migratory bird act—are being whacked every year at Altamont.

Altamont’s turbines, located about 30 miles east of Oakland, Calif., kill more than 100 times as many birds as Exxon’s tanks, and they do so every year. But the Altamont Pass wind farm does not face the same threat of prosecution, even though the bird kills at Altamont have been repeatedly documented by biologists since the mid-1990s.

The number of birds killed by wind turbines is highly variable. And biologists believe Altamont, which uses older turbine technology, may be the worst example. But that said, the carnage there likely represents only a fraction of the number of birds killed by windmills. Michael Fry of the American Bird Conservancy estimates that U.S. wind turbines kill between 75,000 and 275,000 birds per year. Yet the Justice Department is not bringing cases against wind companies.

“Somebody has given the wind industry a get-out-of-jail-free card,” Mr. Fry told me. “If there were even one prosecution,” he added, the wind industry would be forced to take the issue seriously.

Artikelns sista stycken om en före detta utredare av fågeldöd på Fish and Wildlife Service, Rob Lee, som får frågan varför inte vindkraftsbolag stäms för att de dödar örnar och andra fåglar:
“The fix here is not easy or cheap,” Mr. Lee told me. He added that he doesn’t expect to see any prosecutions of the politically correct wind industry.

This is a double standard that more people—and not just bird lovers—should be paying attention to. In protecting America’s wildlife, federal law-enforcement officials are turning a blind eye to the harm done by “green” energy.


(HT: Wind Concerns Ontario)

Relaterat i media: NyTeknik, SMP, SMP, KB, TA
Andra bloggar om vindkraft: Danne Nordling; The Climate Scam, Progressiv Debatt
Andra bloggar om: , , , , , , , , , ,

1 comment:

  1. Tja fåglar dör varje dag, hela tiden och överallt.
    Fåglar lider massivt på lantbrukets monokulturöknar var det ingen föda finns,fåglar dör dagligen i 1000-tal i trafiken och avskjuts rutinmässigt kring flygplatsar.
    Att några dör kring vindkraft anläggningar får man räkna med, dock har jag aldrig hittat en enda död fågel nära landbaserade vindkraft anläggningar, det verkar som fåglarna har lärt sig undvika propellern.

    ReplyDelete

Anonyma, hitta på och ange signatur. Annars gäller att någorlunda hålla sig till ämnet och visa vanlig hyfs.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.


 
´´´´´